I came up with this monster beckett by daydreaming

[hotlemond]

Moerover, I realised this article here speaks of a certain advantage of a downtube/injection tube that conventional design held

latest thoughts on skimmer design

(Fourth paragraph of "Maximizing Air Flow")

For just in case:

BH, this isn't a personal attack, just discussion.

If your design can squeeze out more from a beckett, I won't mind getting one myself

[blueheaven]

Haha no offence taken, we are also matured people

Very interesting article, explains everything I need. Thanks a lot!!!

[blueheaven]

Newly revised design

Added the turbulence reducer but don't know whether it'll work on a beckett

Any comments?

[zorden]

just like BK???

[blueheaven]

The turbulence reducer would be similar to BK only that I am going to use a cone with countersunk holes rather than the tube that BK has

[blueheaven]

I am rather worried that the reducer might not be able to withstand the high pressured water from the Beckett. What you guys think?

[blueheaven]

Some changes to the design to reduce cost

The reaction tube will be 8 inch and 30 inches high

I have also removed the reducers and the turbulence reducer also had some changes

[Kotobuki]

Bro,

the turbulence reducer might cause the bubbles to merge together becoming bigger bubbles. Better way is th raise the height of the skimmer body.

My 2cents

[blueheaven]

I've thought of that

Seems like with enough holes, that would be very minimal

[Sandisct]

can see a tsunami forming with this....

[blueheaven]

Bet you haven't checked out a Quad beckett